I am still of the opinion that what someone says about you, or objects to in your life style, still says far more about them, than it ever will you. So, the question has to be, do you really want to give up something you enjoy, that is safe and not harmful to others, or do you allow this other person to rule of over your life and lifestyle?
It is true that to a degree we all have to compromise in our life, but compromise is not the same as domination, and the one thing I really do know for a fact, is that when people are dominated, they become unhappy, which leads to a whole host of other factors, including depression. I would ask.
Should you allow your joy to be stolen by another?
I feel the compromise here would be, agree to disagree, and continue, but say nothing to this person who objects.
I do think we can expand this situation out into wider society today, for this really is the crux of what we are seeing, the wider society which is uninformed about naturism has been led to believe that naturism is wrong, shameful and lewd by the media and religion, of which there is a strong inclusion of fear mongering. This leads to the suppression of the masses being their own liberated selves, and to a degree, with all their other twisted and wrong messages of control this leads to mass depression, which is what we are seeing currently in society.
Is no different than the mother (Media and Religion) and the son, (The masses)
Shame has always been a weapon of fake moral outrage, it is as old as society, and today we see it more and more used in a digital world, but the truth is, as individuals, we can only be who we are, and yes, even within that, we have to make compromises that allow us to live within the framework of society. This is something that naturists have figured out, which is why, we do not live 24/7 naked, but we can live a good proportion of it that way, dressing only when it is a requirement (Or compromise) to successfully navigate the mainstream.
Rin and myself still feel, the son should not have left naturism, but made a few changes that allowed for naturist activity, out of view of the mother, which is achievable. The result would have been, everyone knows, but no one life is inconvenienced.
I read that and my first reaction was WTF I mean he's a big boy, at 30 he needs to stand up for his own rights and beliefs.
Then I read some the other posts and it got me thinking, as we don't know his full reasoning all we can do it accept the fact, whether we agree or not.
As for me I told all the important people in my life knowing they might not agree, My Mum (83 at the time) was first disaproving but once I explained more about Nudism (She though Naturism was to do with trees lol) She now supports me fully.
My eldest son does not aprove at all, so changes the subject if it comes up, he knows I won't stop and he also knows I will always support him in whatever he does even if I disagree.
Even my Ex Wife supports me in my naturism, she is 100% textile but when I told her her exact words were. "It's not for me but if it helps you and is a stress buster then go for it". All my Ex says is Be Careful which is the same as what Mum say's. Only because it is illegal here.
But then one of my longtime friends of over 40 years hit the roof and got down right nasty, I won't repeat the words she used to describe naturists or my response to her.
Yet the other friends I told have all supported my choices in their own ways.
I just don't know why people, especially families can't just live and let live. I mean do we have to make judgement on everything we don't personally understand or agree with? As for our grown up kids we can guide them very gently if we think it is needed, not rule them! It's their life at the end of the day.