I find the whole idea of child nudity being considered wrong and also sexualised very disturbing when we quite rightly don't want children to be abused.
in UK law a bare image of a child is deemed indecent and therefore sexual on the grounds it may be of interest to a child abuser so a person possessing it is, therefore, a danger to children.
if a child draws an anatomically correct image of themselves or the dog they are reprimanded and the image censored.
if, however, a child draws an image that is seen as sexual by the adults then it is the focus of amusement and ridicule and these days shared on social media for all to laugh at. They even did it as an item on a UK tv show.
when people found out that British naturism includes children they were up in arms assuming and implying abuse was happening and wanting children banned from naturism because they would never let their children do that. and questioned BNs child protection policies (they ban anybody who has been on the sex offender register for life)
on the other hand, when a dressed man went into lego land, hid in a playhouse and abused two girls nobody protested or questioned their child protection policies, and he was never found.
how can we protect kids from harm if society as a whole cannot respect them as the humans they are, dressed or otherwise?